Assailing the Supreme Court
The Wall Street Journal:
After last week’s Supreme Court argument on ObamaCare, the political left seems to be suffering a nervous breakdown. Only a week ago, the liberal consensus was that the federal mandate to buy insurance couldn’t possibly be overturned. Now as panic sets in, the left has taken to mau-mauing the Justices by saying that if they overturn the mandate they’ll be acting like political partisans. The High Court’s very “legitimacy” will be in question, as one editorial put it—a view repeated across the liberal commentariat.This criticism is itself political lobbying, as is clear from the fact that it mostly spares Anthony Kennedy, the likeliest swing vote. Liberals still hope Justice Kennedy will uphold all of the law, even as they audition the mauling he’ll get if he joins Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas in the ninth level of judicial hell. Chief Justice John Roberts is also being lectured that the case will “define” his career, though in six years he has already established a record as a careful consensus builder on the Court.
Overturn any part of the law, the Justices are being told, and your reputations will be trashed.
[...]
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
-
Archives
- June 2013 (336)
- May 2013 (695)
- April 2013 (757)
- March 2013 (589)
- February 2013 (625)
- January 2013 (589)
- December 2012 (660)
- November 2012 (828)
- October 2012 (846)
- September 2012 (862)
- August 2012 (637)
- July 2012 (576)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
