Cambrian Fossils Still a Dilemma for Darwinism 100 Years After Discovery of Burgess Shale
ENV:
Exactly one hundred years ago leading American paleontologist Charles Doolittle Walcott (right) was hiking along Burgess Pass in the Canadian Rockies when he stumbled upon a slab of shale containing fossil crustaceans. His interest piqued, Wolcott made return trips to the Burgess Shale in the following years where he ultimately collected tens of thousands of fossils. Many of these fossils were extraordinarily well-preserved, and they were mysterious. They included strange forms like Anomalocaris, Opabinia, Wiwaxia, and Hallucigenia. These fossils revealed a mystery: like other Cambrian fauna, these strange soft-bodied fossils appeared in the fossil record abruptly, without evolutionary precursors.
[...]
That’s because Darwin was wrong and macro-evolution is pure baloney.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
-
Archives
- February 2012 (643)
- January 2012 (672)
- December 2011 (519)
- November 2011 (361)
- October 2011 (539)
- September 2011 (500)
- August 2011 (584)
- July 2011 (523)
- June 2011 (451)
- May 2011 (437)
- April 2011 (519)
- March 2011 (513)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
