The Times inconsistency on kidnapping coverage
by Ed Morrissey, HOT AIR:
Over the weekend, I explained my decision to stay quiet about the kidnapping of the New York Times’ David Rohde when I first learned about it in March. The Times asked me to refrain from publishing it in order to keep from endangering Rohde, which I agreed could risk his life by giving the Taliban kidnappers exactly what they wanted — an audience. I’m happy with my decision, but Marc Danziger at Winds of Change points out that the Times themselves don’t stick to that policy when someone other than a NYT reporter gets abducted:
[...]
Advertisement
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
-
Archives
- February 2012 (680)
- January 2012 (672)
- December 2011 (519)
- November 2011 (361)
- October 2011 (539)
- September 2011 (500)
- August 2011 (584)
- July 2011 (523)
- June 2011 (451)
- May 2011 (437)
- April 2011 (519)
- March 2011 (513)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
